The findings of this analysis are not unexpected, especially given the limitations highlighted by the reviewers regarding current research. Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of non-sugar sweeteners proves challenging due to the limited and often contradictory evidence available. To render the results more significant, larger sample sizes should be examined over extended periods. Furthermore, the reviewers noted that most studies focused on a single sweetener, which does not accurately represent typical usage patterns. Nevertheless, numerous industry groups and others have criticized the review, asserting that it has its limitations and that additional factors should be taken into account before making conclusions about the benefits of non-sugar sweeteners.
Fred Brouns from the Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences at Maastricht University in the Netherlands mentioned to Nutrition Insight that non-sugar sweeteners are preferable for dental health compared to sucrose, and they also provide the advantage of being calorie-free, which can help mitigate weight gain. He emphasized that other health and lifestyle factors are influential and should not be overlooked, pointing out that the review’s results revealed a “lack of long-term controlled studies.” Other critics, including the Calorie Control Council, an industry association, released a statement disputing the findings of the study review. They argued, “In contrast to the conclusions made by the study authors, the highest quality scientific evidence indicates that the consumption of [low- and no-calorie sweeteners] leads to reductions in body weight, does not contribute to weight gain, and does not trigger cravings that result in increased intake.”
As the discourse surrounding the effectiveness of non-sugar sweeteners continues and with potential new research on the horizon, food and beverage manufacturers might face challenges in determining their next steps. Should they transition to sugar alternatives, or merely decrease their use of sucrose in their products? Many have already begun to adopt one of these strategies in anticipation of or in response to consumer trends regarding sugar. Producers and users of alternative sweeteners may also be pondering the best approach in light of this review, though initial reactions suggest they intend to move forward by emphasizing the positive aspects.
Gavin Partington, director general of the British Soft Drinks Association, conveyed to Nutrition Insight that there is no “solid evidence of any major safety issues” concerning these products. He added that last year, the U.K. government and Public Health England endorsed their use to help reduce sugar consumption and assist consumers facing weight challenges. “Low- and no-calorie sweeteners enable consumers to savor sweetness while managing their sugar and calorie intake in their daily lives. Since they are enjoyable and low- or calorie-free, people are more inclined to incorporate them into a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle, helping them stick to their dietary goals for weight management,” Partington stated.
In this context, individuals curious about incorporating alternatives like calcium citrate into their diet may be wondering how much to take, especially since the ongoing discussion around sweeteners could influence broader dietary choices.