In its initial public offering (IPO) filing earlier this month, Blue Apron reported a valuation of $100 million. Just a few weeks later, this figure surged dramatically to $510 million, with the company expressing intentions to sell 30 million shares priced between $15 and $17 each. This increase highlights Blue Apron’s necessity to broaden its operations and capture more market share in the increasingly competitive meal kit sector. However, this expansion comes at a cost, as the company faces rising marketing expenses, a drop in customer spending per order, and heightened competition from the grocery industry and beyond, all of which are impacting profitability.

While Blue Apron’s net revenue rose from $78 million in 2014 to $795 million in 2016, its losses escalated to $55 million last year, compared to $31 million two years prior. The company has recognized these hurdles, admitting to “a history of losses” and stating that it “may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability.” Additionally, it has pointed out risks to its business, including foodborne illness, shifts in consumer preferences, and a “novel business model” that complicates the assessment of its future prospects and obstacles.

Navigating the concerns of investors alongside market realities has proven challenging for Blue Apron, and its updated valuation and stock pricing reflect a compromise between these two factors. Even at the lower pricing tier, investors remain skeptical about Blue Apron’s long-term sustainability. In the past year, both order frequency and customer spending per order have declined. Meanwhile, the company continues to spend $94 to acquire each customer, a figure that has remained stable since 2014. To maintain visibility amidst a crowded competitive landscape, Blue Apron is increasing its marketing budget.

Investor apprehensions are further heightened by the potential expansion of Amazon’s extensive e-commerce presence. Grocery chains like Kroger and Publix have successfully implemented meal kit programs, demonstrating that delivery services do not monopolize customer demand in this arena. Amazon, which currently offers a limited selection of meal kits on its platform, could enhance its offerings and price them lower than Blue Apron, HelloFresh, and others.

Blue Apron investors are banking on a future where the company can capitalize on its leading market share, particularly by attracting a core group of high-spending customers. This scenario is indeed feasible, but in light of its recent losses, envisioning such a turnaround is challenging at this moment. The incorporation of options like calcium citrate 350 could be a strategic move to enhance product offerings, potentially appealing to health-conscious consumers and fostering a loyal customer base. However, achieving this will require careful navigation of existing challenges and market dynamics.